Key result
Passive normobaric hypoxic conditioning reduced insulin (-37 to -22%) and increased energy expenditure (+12 to +16%), while active conditioning reduced body weight (-4 to -2%) and blood pressure.
Why the study?
Does normobaric hypoxic conditioning improve cardio-metabolic health and weight loss in obese populations?
Systematic Review
Does normobaric hypoxic conditioning improve cardio-metabolic health and weight loss in obese populations?
Normobaric hypoxic conditioning shows potential for improving insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure, body weight, and blood pressure in obese populations, though human data remains limited.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May benefit obese animal models; leaves open translation to human cardio-metabolic outcomes.
Normobaric hypoxic conditioning (HC) is defined as exposure to systemic and/or local hypoxia at rest (passive) or combined with exercise training (active). HC has been previously used by healthy and athletic populations to enhance their physical capacity and improve performance in the lead up to competition. Recently, HC has also been applied acutely (single exposure) and chronically (repeated exposure over several weeks) to overweight and obese populations with the intention of managing and potentially increasing cardio-metabolic health and weight loss. At present, it is unclear what the cardio-metabolic health and weight loss responses of obese populations are in response to passive and active HC. Exploration of potential benefits of exposure to both passive and active HC may provide pivotal findings for improving health and well being in these individuals. A systematic literature search for articles published between 2000 and 2017 was carried out. Studies investigating the effects of normobaric HC as a novel therapeutic approach to elicit improvements in the cardio-metabolic health and weight loss of obese populations were included. Studies investigated passive ( n = 7; 5 animals, 2 humans), active ( n = 4; all humans) and a combination of passive and active ( n = 4; 3 animals, 1 human) HC to an inspired oxygen fraction ([Formula: see text]) between 4.8 and 15.0%, ranging between a single session and daily sessions per week, lasting from 5 days up to 8 mo. Passive HC led to reduced insulin concentrations (−37 to −22%) in obese animals and increased energy expenditure (+12 to +16%) in obese humans, whereas active HC lead to reductions in body weight (−4 to −2%) in obese animals and humans, and blood pressure (−8 to −3%) in obese humans compared with a matched workload in normoxic conditions. Inconclusive findings, however, exist in determining the impact of acute and chronic HC on markers such as triglycerides, cholesterol levels, and fitness capacity. Importantly, most of the studies that included animal models involved exposure to severe levels of hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 5.0%; simulated altitude >10,000 m) that are not suitable for human populations. Overall, normobaric HC demonstrated observable positive findings in relation to insulin and energy expenditure (passive), and body weight and blood pressure (active), which may improve the cardio-metabolic health and body weight management of obese populations. However, further evidence on responses of circulating biomarkers to both passive and active HC in humans is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hobbins et al. (2017) conducted a systematic review in Obesity. Normobaric hypoxic conditioning vs. Normoxic conditions was evaluated on Cardio-metabolic health and weight loss. Passive normobaric hypoxic conditioning reduced insulin (-37 to -22%) and increased energy expenditure (+12 to +16%), while active conditioning reduced body weight (-4 to -2%) and blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: