Key result
The proposed automatic control system maintained the arterial flow rate with a percentage error below 7.57% and the reservoir level with an error below 4.89% during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass.
Why the study?
Operating two occluders during CPB is difficult because it alters both blood flow and reservoir level, posing patient risk.
An automatic control system for cardiopulmonary bypass successfully maintained arterial flow rate and reservoir level within acceptable error margins in a simulated bench model.
Demonstrates automated CPB control feasibility in bench simulation; leaves open translation to animal or clinical use.
Performing a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) requires a well-trained perfusionist with skill and experience. In particular, operating the two occluders is difficult because it changes both the blood flow rate and reservoir level, and failure of the operation puts the patient’s life at risk. This study proposes an automatic control system with a two-degrees-of-freedom model matching controller nested in an I-PD feedback controller to simultaneously regulate the blood flow rate and the reservoir level. Experiments simulating CPB initiation and weaning were conducted using glycerin and bovine blood as perfusates. The results demonstrated that the arterial flow rate tracked the manually adjusted venous flow rate with a percentage error below 7.57%, and the reservoir level was maintained with an error below 4.89%. Then, experiments were conducted that simulated disturbances caused by venting/suction of blood from the surgical field and afterload fluctuation in the patient. The results showed that the control accuracies were not affected by afterload fluctuation; venting/suction disturbance worsened the accuracy of controlling the flow rate (3.26% error), while the reservoir level was maintained at 2.22% error. Thus, the robustness and control accuracies of the proposed system were demonstrated, and the system marks another step toward the automation of CPB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2022) studied Cardiopulmonary bypass (in vitro simulation). Automatic control system for arterial flow rate and reservoir level vs. System without reservoir level control unit was evaluated on Percentage error of arterial flow rate and reservoir level. The proposed automatic control system maintained the arterial flow rate with a percentage error below 7.57% and the reservoir level with an error below 4.89% during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: