Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Few studies have sought to examine empirically the immediate effects of participation in sexual abuse research. The present study investigated the effects of childhood sexual abuse on measures of personality and psychological functioning in 250 males and females. The null hypothesis was that sexually abused and nonabused groups would show no significant differences between pre-and post-testing on measures of state anxiety, state depression, and state anger. No significant differences between pre-and post-testing were observed between nonabused, abused, and severely abused participants. In addition, there were no gender differences among the groups. Findings from this study support those of Savell, Kinder, and Young (2006) Savell, J. K., Kinder, B. N. and Young, M. S. 2006. Effects of administering sexually explicit questionnaires on anger, anxiety, and depression in sexually abuse and non-abused females: Implications for risk assessment. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy., 32: 161–172. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and have significant implications for Institutional Review Boards (IRB) as they suggest that participation in childhood sexual abuse or sexuality research does not place sexually abused individuals at greater than minimal risk for immediate increases in anxiety, depression, or anger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rojas et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: