Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When γ‐radiation from 60Co interacted with fibrous cotton cellulose, the localization of at least part of the high energy resulted in cellulosic chain cleavage and loss in breaking strength of the irradiated fibers. The substitution of aromatic groups on the cotton cellulose molecule affected this localization of energy and decreased the radiation degradation of the fiber. The nature of the linkage of the aromatic group to the cellulose molecule was not as important as the radiation stability of the linkage. For example, if localization of energy occurred which cleaved the aromatic group from the cellulose molecule, the radioprotection of the cellulosic molecular chain by the aromatic group was not effective. If the aromatic group was so modified that the effective number of π‐electrons was decreased, the radioprotection of the cellulosic chain was also decreased. The radioprotection of the cellulosic molecular chain by benzhydryl, trityl, benzoyl, and cinnamoyl groups was effective over distances equivalent to several cellobiose units. The radioprotection of the cellulosic chain by naphthoyl groups was significant but not as effective as the listed groups. Due to the sharing of π‐electrons in the naphthoyl group, the effective number of π‐electrons was reduced, and consequently the radioprotective effect of the group was also reduced. Benzyl groups were cleaved from the cellulose molecule on irradiation and offered no radioprotection to the cellulosic chain, at least at the high radiation dosages used. The ESR spectra of the irradiated celluloses, both substituted and unsubstituted, were similar. This indicated that the presence of aromatic groups did not change the nature of the long‐lived free radicals induced in cellulose on irradiation. It was suggested that selective energy absorption by the aromatic group from the spur of high‐energy electrons produced on interaction of γ‐radiation with the cellulose molecule could account for the radioprotection of the cellulosic molecular chain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: