Key result
Electronic dental equipment, including handpieces, an electric toothbrush, an implant motor, and ultrasonic devices, caused no electromagnetic interference with the tested implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Why the study?
Does electronic dental equipment cause electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Does electronic dental equipment cause electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Common electronic dental equipment, including ultrasonic devices and implant motors, do not cause electromagnetic interference with modern ICDs in an in vitro setting, suggesting they are safe for use in these patients.
No interference from dental equipment in this animal model; leaves open human clinical confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are subject to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of this study was to assess both the EMI of dental equipments with ICDs and related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High- and low-speed handpieces, an electric toothbrush, an implant motor and two types of ultrasonic devices were tested next to an ICD with different sensitivity settings. The ICD was immersed in a saline solution with electrical resistance of 400-800 ohms to simulate the resistance of the human body. The dental equipments were tested in both horizontal (0°) and vertical (90°) positions in relation to the components of the ICD. The tests were performed with a container containing saline solution, which was placed on a dental chair in order to assess the cumulative effect of electromagnetic fields. RESULTS: The dental chair, high- and low-speed handpieces, electric toothbrush, implant motor and ultrasonic devices caused no EMI with the ICD, irrespective of the program set-up or positioning. No cumulative effect of electromagnetic fields was verified. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the devices tested are safe for use in patients with an ICD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dadalti et al. (2017) studied Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Electronic dental equipment vs. Equipment turned off (negative control) was evaluated on Electromagnetic interference (EMI). Electronic dental equipment, including handpieces, an electric toothbrush, an implant motor, and ultrasonic devices, caused no electromagnetic interference with the tested implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: