Key result
The Heparin Removal Device successfully reduced activated coagulation time from 480 to 150 seconds over 130 minutes, providing acceptable haemostasis without the use of protamine sulphate.
Why the study?
Does the Heparin Removal Device (HRD) safely neutralize heparin in a patient with suspected adverse reaction to protamine sulphate undergoing CABG?
Case Report (n=1)
Does the Heparin Removal Device (HRD) safely neutralize heparin in a patient with suspected adverse reaction to protamine sulphate undergoing CABG?
The Heparin Removal Device presents a feasible alternative to protamine sulphate for heparin neutralization in patients with contraindications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May offer HRD alternative for heparin reversal in protamine-intolerant CABG; hypothesis-generating case report requiring prospective validation.
Protamine sulphate is routinely used after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to restore the patient's baseline coagulatory state. However, adverse reactions are encountered, and alternative means to neutralize heparin are, therefore, necessary. The Heparin Removal Device (HRD) constitutes an extracorporeal circuit that allows ex vivo deheparinization by mean of a polycationic ligand that binds heparin molecules. This paper presents the setup of the HRD circuit. It is illustrated by the report of a 68-year-old man with a known severe crustacean allergy. The patient (78 kg, 170 cm) was admitted for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. It was decided that the HRD would be used as a precaution in order to avoid the risks of using protamine sulphate. The CPB time and aortic crossclamp time were 70 and 40 min, respectively. At the end of CPB, the device was inserted and processing started. Activated coagulation time values were monitored over a 130 min period and diminished from 480 to 300 s after 45 min, 220 s after 90 min, and settled at 150 s. Haemostasis was acceptable and processing stopped. The operation was terminated and the patient transferred to the intensive care unit. Clinical evolution was excellent, with minimal postoperative bleeding. The HRD presents an alternative to protamine sulphate when this drug is contraindicated for a certain patient population who might have a suspected, known or emergency adverse reaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jegger et al. (2000) conducted a case report in Suspected adverse reaction to protamine sulphate / severe crustacean allergy (n=1). Heparin Removal Device (HRD) was evaluated on Activated coagulation time and haemostasis. The Heparin Removal Device successfully reduced activated coagulation time from 480 to 150 seconds over 130 minutes, providing acceptable haemostasis without the use of protamine sulphate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: