Key result
Routine preoperative coagulation testing is not evidence-based, and guidelines recommend taking a thorough personal and family history of bleeding instead to determine the need for further testing.
Why the study?
Does routine coagulation screening improve the identification of bleeding disorders and prevent perioperative bleeding in preoperative patients compared to history-taking alone?
Does routine coagulation screening improve the identification of bleeding disorders and prevent perioperative bleeding in preoperative patients compared to history-taking alone?
Routine preoperative coagulation testing is not evidence-based and should be replaced by thorough clinical history-taking to assess bleeding risk.
Supports avoiding routine preoperative coagulation testing via bleeding history; confirms guidelines yet leaves prospective validation open.
Coagulation testing has long been part of the routine assessment of the preoperative patient, with the aim of identifying those with a bleeding disorder who might suffer significant perioperative bleeding. Some of the issues surrounding this involve the low prevalence of bleeding disorders in the general population, and the implications of further testing for both the patient and the health-care system. Studies suggest that this practice is not evidence based and is considered to be outdated. Most guidelines now advise against routine coagulation screens before surgery, and instead recommend taking a thorough personal and family history of bleeding in order to determine the need for further investigations. This review analyses current evidence on this topic and provides a comprehensive view of the relevance of preoperative coagulation testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borges et al. (2017) conducted a review in Preoperative assessment. Routine coagulation screens before surgery vs. Personal and family history of bleeding was evaluated. Routine preoperative coagulation testing is not evidence-based, and guidelines recommend taking a thorough personal and family history of bleeding instead to determine the need for further testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: