Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three mercaptoamines have been lithiated in the presence of various Lewis bases. 2-Mercaptopyrimidine (I), containing a NC(S)NH–(as an amine)/NC(–SH)N–(as a thiol) unit, affords [graphic omitted]S)Li·hmpa]n1. 2-Mercaptothiazoline (II), with a –SC(S)NH–/–SC(–SH)N– unit, gives [graphic omitted]S)Li·tmen]n2. 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (III), having a –NHC(S)NH–/–NHC(–SH)N– unit, gives, when dilithiated, {[graphic omitted]Li2·3hmpa}n3[hmpa = hexamethylphosphoramide, (Me2N)3PO; tmen = Me2NCH2CH2NMe2]. The solid-state structures of complexes 1–3 were solved by X-ray crystallography. Complex 1 is polymeric (n=∞): each unit contains a (NCS)Li chelate feature with a terminal hmpa molecule on Li, and these units are then associated via intermolecular N→Li co-ordinations using the third (N) heteroatom of the organic anion. Complex 2 is a dimeric (n= 2) S–Li compound with each Li bearing a tmen molecule; dimerisation is achieved by N→Li intermonomer interactions, but the third (ring S) heteroatom is not involved with metal centres. The dilithiated species 3 is also a dimer (n= 2) and each Li is chelated by an (NCS) unit of its organic dianion; the two end-Li atoms of the dimer are each co-ordinated to two terminal hmpa molecules, while the two central Li atoms are linked by two µ-hmpa molecules, which effect dimerisation. The structural diversities displayed by 1–3 have been probed, and thereby in part rationalised, by ab initio(6-31G basis set) and MNDO molecular-orbital calculations on the amine/thiol isomers of I–III, and on their uncomplexed and complexed lithiated derivatives (as monomers). In particular, the optimised structures predict and reproduce the (NCS)Li chelating modes found in 1 and 3 and help to explain why direct S–Li bonding is found in 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: