AIM: To evaluate whether bone formation by guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) can be enhanced by the use of a cell-permeable Teflon barrier allowing the penetration of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells from the surrounding soft tissues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DBM was produced from the long bones of rats, and its bone-inductive properties were tested in three rats prior to the study by intramuscular implantation. Thirty, 4-month-old, male albino rats of the Wistar strain were used. Following surgical exposure of the mandibular ramus, a cell-permeable Teflon capsule, loosely packed with DBM, was placed with its opening facing the lateral surface of the ramus (test side). At the contralateral side, serving as control, a non-perforated (cell-occlusive) Teflon capsule, loosely packed with the same amount of DBM, was placed. After healing periods of 30, 60, and 120 days, groups of 10 animals were killed, and 40-70 microm thick undecalcified sections of the capsules were produced. RESULTS: Computer-assisted planimetric measurements on the histological sections disclosed similar amounts of newly formed bone in both test and control capsules. After 4 months, the new bone in the control capsules occupied 45.0% of the cross-sectional area of the capsule, while it was 50.5% in the test capsules. This difference was not statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Similar amounts of bone formed in cell-permeable and cell-occlusive capsules grafted with DBM, suggesting that invasion of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells from the surrounding soft tissues into the barrier-protected area is unnecessary for bone formation with GTR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mardas et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: