Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The protoplasm of hardy and non-hardy cells was compared with regard to displacement by centrifuging, rounding-up time on plasmolysis, deplasmolysis injury, rate of Brownian movement, resistance to and recovery from distortion by micromanipulation. The conclusions are: (i) When the cells are in the normally hydrated (i.e., turgid) condition there is either no difference in the consistency of hardy and non-hardy protoplasm, or else it is slightly less m the latter; (ii) when the cells are plasmolysed to the same degree (i.e., with a weaker plasmolyte in the case of the non-hardy) there is no difference in consistency; (iii) when the cells are in equilibrium with one and the same concentration of plasmolyte, the protoplasmal consistency of the non-hardy is greater than that of the hardy; (iv) the non-hardy are more susceptible to mechanical injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levitt et al. (1940) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: