Key result
Physical exercise during MRI-ergometry significantly increased the mean transstenotic pressure gradient from 18.0 mmHg at rest to 28.5 mmHg (p < 0.001) in patients with aortic coarctation.
Why the study?
In patients with aortic coarctation, assessing pressure gradients and blood flow profiles both at rest and during exercise is desirable.
Does combining MRI-ergometry with computational fluid dynamics allow non-invasive assessment of hemodynamic responses to physical exercise in patients with aortic coarctation?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does combining MRI-ergometry with computational fluid dynamics allow non-invasive assessment of hemodynamic responses to physical exercise in patients with aortic coarctation?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.5% vs 18%
p-value: p=<0.001
Combining MRI-ergometry with computational fluid dynamics is a feasible, non-invasive alternative to cardiac catheterization for assessing transstenotic pressure gradients and flow profiles during physical exercise in patients with aortic coarctation.
Exercise augments transstenotic gradients in aortic coarctation; leaves open whether MRI-ergometry with CFD can supplant catheterization.
In patients with aortic coarctation it would be desirable to assess pressure gradients as well as information about blood flow profiles at rest and during exercise. We aimed to assess the hemodynamic responses to physical exercise by combining MRI-ergometry with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). MRI was performed on 20 patients with aortic coarctation (13 men, 7 women, mean age 21.5 ± 13.7 years) at rest and during ergometry. Peak systolic pressure gradients, wall shear stress (WSS), secondary flow degree (SFD) and normalized flow displacement (NFD) were calculated using CFD. Stroke volume was determined based on MRI. On average, the pressure gradient was 18.0 ± 16.6 mmHg at rest and increased to 28.5 ± 22.6 mmHg (p < 0.001) during exercise. A significant increase in cardiac index was observed (p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by an increase in heart rate (p < 0.001). WSS significantly increased during exercise (p = 0.006), whereas SFD and NFD remained unchanged. The combination of MRI-ergometry with CFD allows assessing pressure gradients as well as flow profiles during physical exercise. This concept has the potential to serve as an alternative to cardiac catheterization with pharmacological stress testing and provides hemodynamic information valuable for studying the pathophysiology of aortic coarctation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schubert et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Aortic coarctation (n=20). Physical exercise (MRI-ergometry) vs. Rest was evaluated on Transstenotic pressure gradient (p=<0.001). Physical exercise during MRI-ergometry significantly increased the mean transstenotic pressure gradient from 18.0 mmHg at rest to 28.5 mmHg (p < 0.001) in patients with aortic coarctation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: