Key result
An indexed aortic cross-sectional area of 81 mm2/m2 predicted the relief of a transcatheter pressure gradient with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in patients with aortic coarctation.
Why the study?
Does the narrowest cross-sectional area (CSA) predict the relief of transcatheter pressure gradient in patients with aortic coarctation?
Observational (n=28)
No
Does the narrowest cross-sectional area (CSA) predict the relief of transcatheter pressure gradient in patients with aortic coarctation?
An indexed cross-sectional area of 81 mm2/m2 measured by intravascular ultrasound is a highly accurate target vessel size to relieve the transcatheter pressure gradient in patients with aortic coarctation.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the precise morphometric data of the aortic arch at which the transcatheter pressure gradient is relieved in patients with aortic coarctation (CoA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine morphometric data were obtained from patients with CoA including the body surface area (BSA) adjusted angiographic diameter of the narrowest vessel, the ratio of the angiographic diameter to that of the descending aorta and BSA-adjusted narrowest cross-sectional area (CSA) using intravascular ultrasound imaging. The transcatheter peak-to-peak pressure gradient of the aortic arch was measured using a manometer tipped catheter. A linear regression analysis showed CSA to have the strongest correlation with the pressure gradient (r=0.92, p=0.0002) among any pressure gradient group (n=10). A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the morphometric cut-off point at which the pressure gradient occurs. CSA had the highest areas under the ROC (1.0) and the cut-off point of 81 mm2/m2 showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100% to predict the relief of a pressure gradient. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CoA, the vessel size that can relieve a pressure gradient is a CSA of 81 mm2/m2 (10 x BSA0.5 mm in diameter). This data may provide useful information for catheter intervention and surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeda et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Aortic coarctation (CoA) or interrupted aortic arch (n=28). Indexed aortic cross-sectional area (CSA) vs. Presence vs absence of pressure gradient was evaluated on Prediction of transcatheter pressure gradient relief using indexed CoA cross-sectional area (AUC 1.00, p=0.0002). An indexed aortic cross-sectional area of 81 mm2/m2 predicted the relief of a transcatheter pressure gradient with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in patients with aortic coarctation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: