Key result
Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomies, 27.7% received blood transfusions, of which 19.2% were deemed inappropriate based on clinical guidelines.
Why the study?
What is the rate of inappropriate blood transfusions in patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies?
Observational (n=368)
No
What is the rate of inappropriate blood transfusions in patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies?
Nearly one in five blood transfusions in emergency laparotomy patients were deemed inappropriate, highlighting the need for more judicious use of blood products on surgical wards.
Suggests opportunities to optimize transfusion decisions in emergency surgery; hypothesis-generating for prospective stewardship trials.
Purpose: Decisions regarding perioperative blood transfusions are subject to clinical and laboratory factors. Blood transfusions are associated with increased risk of infection, sepsis, organ failure, and length of stay. Current guidelines on transfusions are based on elective settings. There is a paucity of data on blood transfusion use in emergency surgery. This study reviews the appropriateness of blood transfusions in patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies. Methods: Patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies at Peninsula Health from January 2013 to May 2015 were reviewed. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels triggering transfusion and overall blood utilization were obtained. Transfusions were classified based on whether they were given pre-, intra-or postoperatively. Transfusions with Hb 80 g/L in the absence of bleeding or preoperative anemia were deemed 'inappropriate' as per Australian Blood Authority guidelines. Results: Over the 29-month period, 368 patients underwent 398 emergency laparotomies. Blood transfusions were given to 102 patients (27.7%). These patients required 240 transfusion episodes. Patients were given a median of three units of blood. One hundred and sixty-six transfusions (69.2%) were postoperative. Forty-six transfusions (19.2%) were given with Hb 80 g/L in the absence of other indications, and were deemed inappropriate. Inappropriate transfusions occurred more frequently on the ward compared to ICU (p0.05). Almost two thirds of inappropriate transfusions were given for Hb 8085 g/L. Conclusion: Nearly one in five patients received an inappropriate transfusion. More judicious use of blood products in emergency patients is required, especially on surgical wards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narasimhan et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Emergency general surgical laparotomies (n=368). Blood transfusions was evaluated on Inappropriate blood transfusions. Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomies, 27.7% received blood transfusions, of which 19.2% were deemed inappropriate based on clinical guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: