We present initial results of a new, systematic search for massive star formation in the host galaxies of the most luminous and probably most massive radio-quiet quasars . The survey, undertaken at 850μm using SCUBA at the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), has a target sensitivity limit of , set to identify sources suitable for detailed follow-up, e.g. continuum mapping and molecular line diagnostics. A total of 38 radio-quiet quasars have been observed at 850μm, of which eight were detected (>3σ) with (submillimetre-loud). The new detections almost triple the number of optically selected, submillimetre-loud radio-quiet quasars known to date. We include a detailed description of how our quasar sample is defined in terms of radio and optical properties. As a by-product of our selection procedure, we have identified 17 radio-loud quasars with . There is no strong evidence for trends in either detectability or 850-μm flux with absolute magnitude, MB. We find that the weighted mean flux of the undetected sources is , consistent with an earlier estimate of ∼3mJy based on more sensitive observations of a sample radio-quiet quasars. This corresponds to an inferred star formation rate of ∼1000M⊙yr−1, similar to Arp220. The typical star formation time-scale for the submillimetre-bright sources is ∼1Gyr, 10 times longer than the typical accretion-driven e-folding time-scale of ∼. Our 850-μm detection of the quasar PSS J1048+4407, when analysed in conjunction with 1.2-mm single-dish and interferometric observations, suggests that this source is resolved on angular scales of . In addition, we present a new optical spectrum of this source, identifying it as a broad absorption line (BAL) quasar. The new redshift is outside that covered in a recent CO line search, highlighting the need for accurate redshifts for the observation and interpretation of high-redshift line studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isaak et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: