Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In previous work, mutations induced by the (+)-anti diol epoxide of benzo[a]pyrene [(+)-anti-B[a]PDE] were scored in the supF gene of the Escherichia coli plasmid pUB3 [Rodriguez & Loechler (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1759]. pUB3 was reacted with (+)-anti-B[a]PDE and then either (1) transformed immediately into E. coli or (2) heated at 80 degrees C for 10 min prior to transformation. Heating only released a small fraction of adducts (approximately 5%) and did not significantly affect the mutagenic pattern at most sites in supF. However, at the major base substitution hotspot, G115, principally G-->T mutations (87%) were obtained prior to heating, while after heating, G-->T mutations decreased (45%) and G-->A (21%) and G-->C (33%) mutations became more prevalent. One model for this result is that prior to heating a heat-labile adduct at G115 causes one pattern of mutagenesis, but after heating the labile adduct is hydrolyzed to an apurinic site (AP site), which causes a second mutational pattern. To test this, a role for AP sites generated from labile adducts by heating at 80 degrees C for 10 min is investigated. It is shown that when plasmid pUB3 contains 22 (+)-anti-B[a]PDE adducts, 0.6% (or fewer) are converted to AP sites as determined in an assay based upon the action of an AP-endonuclease. In a separate line of investigation not involving (+)-anti-B[a]PDE adducts, mutation frequency (MF) per AP site is estimated. (In these experiments, AP sites were introduced into pUB3 by the classic procedure of heating at 70 degrees C/pH 5.0 to hydrolyze purines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drouin et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: