Key result
Extending the night into the evening caused an immediate response in activity patterns, whereas extending it into the morning caused a significant delay, highlighting the evening oscillator's role.
In European hamsters, the evening oscillator is more important than the morning oscillator in inducing the photoperiodic response to short days.
Does not inform human chronotherapy; leaves open evening oscillator primacy across mammalian species.
The European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) is a circannual species in which the synchronization of the circannual cycle to the natural year occurs during 2 annual phases of sensitivity. Around the summer solstice, the animals are sensitive to a shortening of photoperiod. During this sensitive phase, pronounced changes in circadian output parameters are observed, indicating a different functional state of the circadian system. This special state is assumed to be necessary to develop the extreme sensitivity to short day length in European hamsters during this phase. In natural conditions, the animals are able to recognize the shortening of photoperiod already in mid-July, when the photoperiod is reduced only by 30 min. To investigate the short-day response in sensitive European hamsters on the basis of the 2-coupled oscillator model of Pittendrigh and Daan (1976), daily activity and the reproductive state of European hamsters were recorded after an asymmetrical reduction of photoperiod from long (LD 16:08) to short (LD 08:16) photoperiods. The activity pattern of the animals showed an immediate response to the short photoperiod at the day of transfer when the night was extended only into the evening, but there was a significant delay in the response time when the night was extended into the morning. Thus, the evening oscillator E is more important in inducing the photoperiodic response than the morning oscillator M. Moreover, the broad intragroup variation in the latter conditions strongly suggests that the changes in the activity pattern were endogenously induced and that the animals were not able to recognize a lengthening of the night into the morning. Gonadal regression started in both groups 3 weeks after the change in the activity pattern, indicating that this process is initiated when the circadian system has received the short-day signal either through changes in photoperiod or through the circannual clock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monecke et al. (2006) studied Circannual cycle and photoperiod response. Asymmetrical reduction of photoperiod (night extended into evening) vs. Night extended into morning was evaluated on Daily activity pattern and reproductive state (gonadal regression). Extending the night into the evening caused an immediate response in activity patterns, whereas extending it into the morning caused a significant delay, highlighting the evening oscillator's role.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: