Longitudinal study observes menstrual cycle phases and contraceptive types alter recovery in female endurance athletes, highlighting the need for individualized symptom management.
This longitudinal study investigated 1) differences in self-reported cycle-related symptom severity and recovery measures (sleep quality, readiness to train, resting heart rate) between pre-bleeding, bleeding, and non-bleeding days in athletes using/not using hormonal contraception (HC); 2) associations between symptom severity and recovery measures. Fifty-eight female endurance athletes recorded recovery measures, perceived symptom severity, and menstruation/withdrawal (bleeding) days for one year. Athletes were grouped as: intrauterine system (IUS)-, implant-, progestin-only oral contraceptive (POC)-, combined oral contraceptive (COC)- and non-HC users. All groups reported higher symptom severity during bleeding compared to pre-bleeding and non-bleeding days (both p < .001), while implant users reported less severe symptoms than IUS (p < .001) and non-HC users (p = .008). Perceived sleep quality was lower during pre-bleeding compared to bleeding days (p < .001) for all groups. However, IUS users reported higher sleep quality (p = .039) and physical readiness-to-train (p = .010) than non-HC users. Symptom severity was negatively associated with sleep quality and physical readiness-to-train (both p < .050). Pre-bleeding days and cycle-related symptom severity were found to negatively influence self-reported recovery measures in both HC- and non-HC users. Therefore, athletes and their support staff are advised to prioritize symptom management and the adjustment of recovery strategies on an individual basis throughout the athletes’ cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engseth et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: