Key result
Staged biventricular conversion yielded similar survival to direct conversion (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.2-3.7; P=0.95) but was associated with a higher risk of reoperations (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.1; P=0.01).
Why the study?
Restoring biventricular circulation is an alternative strategy in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects (uAVCDs), especially with risk factors for single-ventricle palliation (SVP) failure, but experience with biventricular conversion (BIVC) after prior SVP needed review.
Does staged recruitment before biventricular conversion compared to direct conversion affect mortality and reinterventions in patients with unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects after single-ventricle palliation?
Cohort (n=65)
No
Does staged recruitment before biventricular conversion compared to direct conversion affect mortality and reinterventions in patients with unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects after single-ventricle palliation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.9 (95% CI 0.2–3.7)
p-value: p=0.95
Staged biventricular conversion is a viable strategy for severe uAVCDs with inadequate ventricular volume, yielding similar survival to direct conversion despite an increased risk of reoperations.
Staged conversion may remain viable in select uAVCD cases; leaves open whether direct conversion reduces reoperations pending prospective data.
Objective Restoration of biventricular circulation is an alternative management strategy in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects (uAVCDs), especially in patients with risk factors for single-ventricle palliation (SVP) failure. When ventricular volume is inadequate for biventricular circulation, recruitment procedures may accommodate its growth. In this study, we review our uAVCD experience with biventricular conversion (BIVC) after prior SVP. Methods This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of uAVCD patients who underwent BIVC after SVP, with staged recruitment (staged) or primary BIVC (direct) between 2003 to 2018. Mortality, unplanned reinterventions, imaging, and catheterization data were analyzed. Results Sixty-five patients underwent BIVC from SVP (17 stage 1, 42 bidirectional Glenn, and 6 Fontan). Decision for conversion was based on poor SVP candidacy (n = 43) or 2 adequately sized ventricles (n = 22). Of the 65 patients, 20 patients underwent recruitment before conversion. The staged group had more severe ventricular hypoplasia than the direct group, reflected in prestaging end-diastolic volume z scores (–4.0 vs –2.6; P < .01), which significantly improved after recruitment (–4.0 to –1.8; P < .01). Median follow-up time was 1.0 years. Survival and recatheterizations were similar between both groups (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.2-3.7; P = .95 and hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-4.1; P = .09), but more reoperations occurred with staged approach (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.1; P = .01). Conclusions Biventricular conversion from SVP is an alternative strategy to manage uAVCD, particularly when risk factors for SVP failure are present. Severe forms of uAVCDs can be converted with staged BIVC with acceptable mortality, albeit increased reinterventions, when primary BIVC is not possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects (uAVCDs) (n=65). Staged biventricular conversion (staged recruitment) vs. Primary biventricular conversion (direct) was evaluated on Survival (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.2-3.7, p=0.95). Staged biventricular conversion yielded similar survival to direct conversion (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.2-3.7; P=0.95) but was associated with a higher risk of reoperations (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.1; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: