Key result
Radionuclide plethysmography using a mobile detection system showed good correlation with strain gauge plethysmography for evaluating reactive hyperemia (r = 0.87).
Why the study?
Does radionuclide plethysmography using a mobile detection system correlate with strain gauge plethysmography for evaluating reactive hyperemia in human subjects?
Observational (n=26)
Does radionuclide plethysmography using a mobile detection system correlate with strain gauge plethysmography for evaluating reactive hyperemia in human subjects?
A novel mobile detection system using radionuclide plethysmography is a valid, non-invasive alternative to strain gauge plethysmography for assessing forearm blood flow during reactive hyperemia.
Supports portable reactive hyperemia assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We validated a novel mobile detection system to evaluate reactive hyperemia using the radionuclide plethysmography technique. Twenty-six subjects underwent simultaneously radionuclide plethysmography with strain gauge plethysmography. Strain gauge and radionuclide methods showed excellent reproducibility with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.89 respectively. There was also a good correlation of flows between the two methods during reactive hyperemia (r = 0.87). We conclude that radionuclide plethysmography using this mobile detection system is a non-invasive alternative to assess forearm blood flow and its dynamic variations during reactive hyperemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harel et al. (2007) reported an observational. Radionuclide plethysmography using a mobile detection system vs. Strain gauge plethysmography was evaluated on Correlation of flows between the two methods during reactive hyperemia (r = 0.87). Radionuclide plethysmography using a mobile detection system showed good correlation with strain gauge plethysmography for evaluating reactive hyperemia (r = 0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: