Key result
Contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels detected significant attenuation differences between regional fat depots (P<0.05), unlike non-contrast CT (P=0.36).
Why the study?
Does dual energy CT (DECT) improve the discrimination of regional fat density compared to non-enhanced cardiac CT?
Observational (n=36)
Does dual energy CT (DECT) improve the discrimination of regional fat density compared to non-enhanced cardiac CT?
p-value: p=<0.05
Dual energy CT with contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels allows for better discrimination of regional fat depot attenuation compared to non-contrast CT.
Contrast-enhanced DECT may improve fat depot discrimination versus non-contrast CT; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Regional fat density assessed by computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as a marker of perivascular adipose tissue inflammation. Dual energy CT (DECT) allows improved tissue characterization compared to conventional CT. PURPOSE: To explore whether DECT might aid regional fat density discrimination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients who had completed a non-enhanced cardiac CT scan, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and a delayed enhancement CT. Attenuation levels (Hounsfield units [HU]) were assessed at the epicardial, paracardial, visceral, and subcutaneous fat. The number of coronary segments with disease (SIS) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-six (72%) patients had evidence of obstructive disease at CCTA and 25 (69%) patients had evidence of previous myocardial infarction. At non-contrast CT, we did not identify significant attenuation differences between epicardial, paracardial, subcutaneous, and visceral fat depots (-110.8 ± 9 HU, vs. -113.7 ± 9 HU, vs. -114.7 ± 8 HU, vs. -113.8 ± 11 HU, P = 0.36). Significant attenuation differences were detected between fat depots at mid and low energy levels, both at CTCA and delayed-enhancement scans ( P < 0.05 for all). Epicardial fat showed the least negative attenuation, irrespective of the acquisition mode; epicardial fat evaluated at 40 keV was related to the SIS (r = 0.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, regional fat depots amenable to examination during thoracic CT scans have distinctive regional attenuation values. Furthermore, such differences were better displayed using contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez-Granillo et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing cardiac CT (n=36). Contrast-enhanced and delayed-enhanced cardiac CT (Dual energy CT) vs. Non-contrast CT was evaluated on Attenuation differences between epicardial, paracardial, subcutaneous, and visceral fat depots (p=<0.05). Contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels detected significant attenuation differences between regional fat depots (P<0.05), unlike non-contrast CT (P=0.36).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: