Key result
PCSK9 targeted therapies did not significantly alter the risk of incident atrial fibrillation compared to the control group (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.03, p=0.11).
Why the study?
PCSK9 targeted therapies effectively lower LDL-C and circulating PCSK9 levels, but their effect on the risk of arrhythmias remains uncertain.
Does PCSK9 targeted therapy alter the risk of incident arrhythmias in patients with hypercholesterolemia or acute coronary syndrome?
Meta-Analysis (n=95,520)
Does PCSK9 targeted therapy alter the risk of incident arrhythmias in patients with hypercholesterolemia or acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.03)
p-value: p=0.11
PCSK9 targeted therapies do not significantly alter the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, compared to control treatments.
PCSK9 inhibitors pose no excess atrial fibrillation risk; confirms arrhythmia safety in hypercholesterolemia and ACS.
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) targeted therapies effectively lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and circulating PCSK9 levels. However, their effect on the risk of arrhythmias remains uncertain, and this meta-analysis aims to investigate the association. We performed a systematic literature search on all electronic databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until 16th August, 2024. Primary clinical endpoint was atrial fibrillation (AFib), while the secondary endpoints were atrial flutter (AFL), ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), sudden cardiac death (SCD), cardiac arrest and atrioventricular blocks. 28 RCTs with 95,520 patients were finally included in the analysis. The mean age of the group treated with PCSK9 inhibitors was similar to the control group (60.13 years vs. 60.06 years). At mean follow-up of 1.6 years the PCSK9i group had similar risk of AFib (OR, 0.88; 95%CI: 0.75-1.03, p =0.11), AFL (OR, 1.04; 95%CI: 0.70-1.54, p =0.84), VT (OR, 0.80; 95%CI: 0.58-1.11, p =0.18), VF (OR, 0.77;95%CI: 0.40-1.47, p =0.43) and SVT (OR, 0.94; 95%CI: 0.56-1.58, p =0.82) compared to control group. Similarly, the SCD (OR, 0.91; 95%CI: 0.62-1.32, p =0.61), and AV block (OR, 0.72; 95%CI: 0.34-1.52, p =0.39) did not differ between the groups. This meta-analysis did not find a significant association between PCSK9i and arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaiswal et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypercholesterolemia or acute coronary syndrome (n=95,520). PCSK9 targeted therapies vs. Placebo or other medication was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation (AFib) (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.03, p=0.11). PCSK9 targeted therapies did not significantly alter the risk of incident atrial fibrillation compared to the control group (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.03, p=0.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: