Key result
The modified double hemorrhage model induced a high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (ESAS-score III or IV) in 63.5% of the rats, making it suitable for evaluating severe SAH outcomes.
Why the study?
Extravasated blood indicates SAH severity across experimental models, and establishing an experimental grading system related to the human Fisher-Score could better correlate outcome parameters with severity.
Does the modified double hemorrhage model reliably induce severe subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats that can be graded using a histological severity score?
Does the modified double hemorrhage model reliably induce severe subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats that can be graded using a histological severity score?
Absolute Event Rate: 63.5% vs 0%
The ESAS-score provides a reliable histological grading system for experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats, demonstrating that the double hemorrhage model consistently induces severe SAH.
Does not inform clinical SAH management; leaves open further preclinical validation of histological grading tools.
OBJECTIVE: The amount of extravasated blood is an established surrogate marker for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) severity, which varies in different experimental SAH (eSAH) models. A comprehensive eSAH grading system would allow a more reliable correlation of outcome parameters with SAH severity. The aim of this study was to define a severity score for eSAH related to the Fisher-Score in humans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: SAH was induced in 135 male rats using the modified double hemorrhage model. A sham group included 8 rats, in which saline solution instead of blood was injected. Histological analysis with HE(hematoxylin-eosin)-staining for the visualization of blood was performed in all rats on day 5. The amount and distribution of blood within the subarachnoid space and ventricles (IVH) was analyzed. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 49.6% (71/143). In all except five SAH rats, blood was visible within the subarachnoid space. As expected, no blood was detected in the sham group. The following eSAH severity score was established (ESAS-score): grade I: no SAH visible; grade II: local or diffuse thin SAH, no IVH; grade III: diffuse / thick layers of blood, no IVH; grade IV: additional IVH. Grade I was seen in five rats (7.9%), grade II in 28.6% (18/63), grade III in 41.3% (26/63) and grade IV in 22.2% (14/63) of the rats with eSAH. CONCLUSION: The double hemorrhage model allows the induction of a high grade SAH in more than 60% of the rats, making it suitable for the evaluation of outcome parameters in severe SAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mielke et al. (2020) studied Subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=143). Modified double hemorrhage model vs. Sham (saline solution) was evaluated on Induction of high-grade SAH (ESAS-score III or IV). The modified double hemorrhage model induced a high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (ESAS-score III or IV) in 63.5% of the rats, making it suitable for evaluating severe SAH outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: