Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a detailed comparison between predicted and empirical PL I , K relations and the Wesenheit function for Galactic and Magellanic Cloud (MC) first overtone (FO) Cepheids. We find that zero points predicted by Galactic Cepheid models based on a noncanonical (mild overshooting) mass-luminosity ( ML ) relation are in very good agreement with empirical zero points based on Hipparcos parallaxes, while those based on the canonical (no overshooting) ML relation are ≈0.2-0.3 mag brighter. We also find that the predicted and empirical PL K relations and Wesenheit function give, according to optical ( V , I ; Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment) and near-infrared ( K ; Two Micron All Sky Survey) data, mean distances to the MCs that agree at the 2% level. Individual distances to the Large and the Small MCs are 18.53 ± 0.08 and 19.04 ± 0.11 (theory) as well as 18.48 ± 0.13 and 19.01 ± 0.13 (empirical). Moreover, predicted and empirical FO relations do not present, within the errors, a metallicity dependence. Finally, we find that the upper limit in the FO period distribution is a robust observable to constrain the accuracy of pulsation models. Current models agree within 0.1 in log P with the observed FO upper limits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bono et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: