Key result
Preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy will be evaluated against fast-acting NRT alone for smoking cessation in a planned randomized controlled trial of 200 adult smokers in Kazakhstan.
Why the study?
Tobacco-related deaths continue to rise in Kazakhstan, and the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preloaded combination NRT on smoking cessation, quality of life, and treatment adherence.
Does preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy improve sustained abstinence from smoking in current smokers motivated to quit?
RCT (n=200)
Single-blind
Block randomization
No
Does preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy improve sustained abstinence from smoking in current smokers motivated to quit?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy improves 6-month smoking abstinence compared to fast-acting NRT alone in Kazakhstan.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol tests preloaded combination NRT versus fast-acting alone; leaves open whether it boosts 6-month abstinence in Kazakh smokers.
BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is a major cause of premature death and disease in Kazakhstan, with over 22,500 deaths per year. Although efforts have been made to control tobacco use, smoking-related deaths have continued to increase. One strategy to help smokers quit is to use nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), with combination NRT resulting in higher long-term quit rates than a single form of NRT. A study aims to determine the effectiveness of preloaded combination NRT on smoking cessation, the change in health-related quality of life due to smoking cessation, and explore treatment adherence perceptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted as a randomized, single-blind superiority trial, with 100 participants in each arm. The trial will be carried out at the National Research Cardiac Surgery Center, Astana, Kazakhstan, and will recruit current smokers aged 18 years and above with a motivation to quit. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group. The former will receive preloaded combination NRT, while the latter will receive fast-acting NRT alone. The primary outcome measure will be sustained abstinence from smoking after six months. Secondary outcome measures will include health-related quality of life and adherence to the treatment. DISCUSSION: The study may gather further evidence that a combination NRT is more efficient than a fast-acting NRT alone. The findings of this study may help to improve tobacco cessation strategies in Kazakhstan and other countries with high smoking prevalence rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05484505.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Purushothama et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Tobacco smoking (n=200). Preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy vs. Fast-acting NRT alone (nicotine chewing gum) was evaluated on Sustained abstinence from smoking at 12 months. Preloaded combination nicotine replacement therapy will be evaluated against fast-acting NRT alone for smoking cessation in a planned randomized controlled trial of 200 adult smokers in Kazakhstan.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: