Key result
As a revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass resulted in greater excess weight loss compared to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (72% vs 47%).
Why the study?
Due to high rates of patients requiring re-do surgery after primary sleeve gastrectomy because of weight loss failure, this study compared RYGB and OAGB as secondary interventions.
Does Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass improve weight loss compared to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a revisional surgery after failed sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients?
Cohort (n=63)
No
Does Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass improve weight loss compared to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a revisional surgery after failed sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 72% vs 47%
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass appears more effective in terms of weight loss than One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a revisional surgery after failed sleeve gastrectomy.
Introduction: According to the high rate of patients requiring a Re-Do surgery after a primary Sleeve Gastrectomy, due to failure on weight loss, this study proposes a comparison between RYGB and OAGB as a secondary intervention for morbidly obese patients. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent revisional surgery to convert SG to RYGB or OAGB at our institution from November 2011 to November 2019 was performed. Results: A subset of sixty-three patients with previous SG underwent revisional surgery due to failure of the primary intervention. The OAGB group (n = 17) had a mean BMI at the time of the sleeve of 62 kg/m2 and a mean BMI of 50.7 kg/m2, the length of the Omega was 139.35 cm. The RYGB (n = 46) group showed a mean BMI of 47 kg/m2 at the time of the sleeve and a BMI of 34.8 kg/m2 at the time of the revision. The RYGB was performed according to the 70/120 cm standard for all the patients. One patient also had a revision from secondary OAGB to RYGB due to persistent biliary reflux, in this case the biliary branch was settled at 150 cm and the alimentary at 50 cm. Conclusions: The outcomes in the OAGB group showed a 29%WL and a 47%EWL (out of a 17%WL and 28%EWL at the time of the sleeve), on the other side the RYGB group reached a 33%WL and 72%EWL (out of a 25%WL and a 54%EWL at the time of the sleeve). According to our data we assume that RYGB is more effective in terms of weight loss as a revisional surgery after sleeve
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Auricchio et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity with failure of primary sleeve gastrectomy (n=63). Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) was evaluated on Excess weight loss (%EWL). As a revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass resulted in greater excess weight loss compared to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (72% vs 47%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: