Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Bacterial peritonitis (BP) is a serious complication commonly associated with cirrhosis and ascites, often leading to high mortality rates. Although these effects could be reduced with timely and appropriate antibiotics, traditional BP diagnosis relies on culture, often delaying targeted treatment. Therefore, the use of fast molecular assays holds the potential to enhance laboratory diagnosis. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic performaance of Molecular Culture ID, a broad PCR-based assay targeting the 16S-23S interspace rDNA region in the scope of BP diagnosis. Methods The residual material from 247 peritoneal fluid samples submitted for routine diagnostics was analyzed using Molecular Culture ID and compared alongside the standard of care (SOC) results. Results Sample positivity and species identification outcomes of Molecular Culture ID were compared to those of SOC. Molecular Culture ID yielded 1.6x more positive samples than SOC. Percent positive agreement (PPA) between Molecular Culture ID and SOC at the sample level was 90.1% (IC 95%, 81.0% to 95.1%), and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 70.5% (IC 95%, 63.3% to 76.7%). At the species level, the PPA was 75.2% (95% CI 67.2% to 81.8%). Molecular Culture ID yielded 289 extra bacterial identifications, mainly anaerobic species. High leukocyte counts, indicative of infection, were concordant with Molecular Culture ID positivity. Conclusion Molecular Culture ID demonstrated enhanced BP diagnostic capabilities compared to SOC, with higher positivity rates, more comprehensive species identification for difficult to culture species and a high correlation with leukocyte counts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: