Key result
High-throughput sequencing of rhesus monkey PBMCs infected with EV71 and CA16 revealed 106 known and 13 novel miRNAs with significant expression differences between the two viruses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different miRNA expression profiles in PBMCs infected with EV71 and CA16 suggest distinct innate and adaptive immune responses to these viruses.
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) are the predominant pathogens of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Although these viruses exhibit genetic homology, the clinical manifestations caused by the two viruses have some discrepancies. In addition, the underlying mechanisms leading to these differences remain unclear. microRNAs (miRNAs) participate in numerous biological or pathological processes, including host responses to viral infections. Here, we focused on differences in miRNA expression patterns in rhesus monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) infected with EV71 and CA16 at various time points using high-throughput sequencing. The results demonstrated that 106 known and 13 novel miRNAs exhibited significant differences, and 32 key miRNAs among them for target prediction presented opposite trends in the EV71- and CA16-infected samples. GO and pathway analysis of the predicted targets showed enrichment in 14 biological processes, 10 molecular functions, 8 cellular components and 104 pathways. Subsequently, regulatory networks of miRNA-transcription factors, miRNA-predicted targets, miRNA-GOs and miRNA-pathways were constructed to reveal the complex regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs during the infection phase. Ultimately, we analysed hierarchical GO categories of the predicted targets involved in immune system processes, which indicated that the innate and adaptive immunity following EV71 and CA16 infections may be remarkably distinct. In conclusion, this report is the first describing miRNA expression profiles in PBMCs with EV71 and CA16 infections using high-throughput sequencing. Our findings could provide a valuable basis for further studies on the regulatory roles of miRNAs related to the different immune responses caused by EV71 and CA16 infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2016) studied Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) infections. EV71 and CA16 infections was evaluated on miRNA expression patterns. High-throughput sequencing of rhesus monkey PBMCs infected with EV71 and CA16 revealed 106 known and 13 novel miRNAs with significant expression differences between the two viruses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: