Key result
The prevalence of background hypertension among STEMI-alert patients did not significantly differ between 2019 (72.6%, OR 0.72) or 2021 (75.0%, OR 0.78) compared to the 2020 COVID-19 peak (78.9%).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether STEMI-alert patients during the COVID-19 lockdown and peak in 2020 presented with worse background disease, including higher hypertension prevalence, compared to 2019 and 2021.
Does the prevalence of background hypertension in STEMI-activated patients differ between the COVID-19 peak year (2020) and the years 2019 or 2021?
Observational (n=1,001)
Yes
Does the prevalence of background hypertension in STEMI-activated patients differ between the COVID-19 peak year (2020) and the years 2019 or 2021?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The prevalence of background hypertension in STEMI-activated patients was notably high (75.4%) but did not significantly change during the COVID-19 pandemic peak in 2020 compared to 2019 and 2021.
Background About 47% of United States adults have hypertension (HTN) per the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines, where the blood pressure target is <130/90 mmHg. Prevalence is worse in certain distributions of the country with top quartile in the Southeastern pocket. In a subset of patients who present with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), the prevalence is 30-40%. An interesting further subset of patients are those who presented as STEMI-alert during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 wreaked havoc on the world with its first confirmed case in 9 January 2020. International followed by national transport became limited, followed by announcement of a pandemic. Quarantines and lockdowns were set in place, especially in March 2020, to prevent epidemiologic spread. Hypothesis We were interested to observe if STEMI-alert patients during this period presented with worse background disease compared to years 2019 and 2021, years before and after COVID-lockdown and peak, including if the prevalence of background HTN increased in the population. Methods We evaluated 1001 adults who were STEMI-activated from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021 at five sites in Southwest Ohio. We obtained patient demographics and risk factors and performed multinomial logistic regression to compare years 2019 and 2021 to 2020. Statistical analysis was with SAS 9.4. Results For 1001 STEMI-alert patients, 244 patients (72.6%) had HTN in 2019, 250 (78.9%) in 2020 and 261 (75.0%) in 2021. Overall prevalence over the three years was 755 (75.4%). Compared to 2020, 2019 prevalence was not significant (p=0.12) (OR 0.72) (CI 0.47,1.09). Neither was 2021 (p=0.25) (OR 0.78) (CI 0.51,1.19). Conclusion STEMI-alert patients at our institution appeared to have higher overall prevalence of HTN than reported nationally by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 75.4% versus 47%. These may have self-selected for disease severity by STEMI-alert activation status. HTN may also be of higher prevalence in this region, be associated with poor disease detection or there may be patient compliance issues when antihypertensives are prescribed by a healthcare provider. HTN prevalence did not have statistical significance across the three observed years despite our hypothesis that patients would present with more background cardiac comorbidities such as HTN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,001). Presentation in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) vs. Presentation in 2020 (COVID-19 peak) was evaluated on Prevalence of background hypertension (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.47-1.09, p=0.12). The prevalence of background hypertension among STEMI-alert patients did not significantly differ between 2019 (72.6%, OR 0.72) or 2021 (75.0%, OR 0.78) compared to the 2020 COVID-19 peak (78.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: