We evaluated the performance of four frequently used cholesterol test systems, using split-sample measurements with a panel of 79 patients' specimens and isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID GS-MS) as a comparison method. The test systems were from Beckman, a Boehringer Mannheim, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, performed on the Synchron CX7, Hitachi 717, Mega, and Ektachem 250 analyzers, respectively. The liner regression data for the method comparison [ID GS-MS as independent variable (x)] were for Beckman: slope = 1.012, intercept = 0.0243 mmol/L, dispersion (S(y/x)) = 0.1303 mmol/l, and correlation coefficient (r) = 0.9867; for Boehringer Mannheim: slope = 1.002, intercept = 0.114 mmol/L, Sy/x = 0.0759 mmol/L, r = 0.9954; for Merck: slope = 1.034, intercept = -0.0613 mmol/L, Sy/x = 0.0886 mmol/L, r = 0.9941; and for Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics: slope = 1.007, intercept = 0.01 mmol/L, Sy/x = 0.15 mmol/L, and r = 0.9811. These data demonstrate excellent state-of-the-art cholesterol measurement for some of the most widely used test systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thienpont et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: