Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The UV absorber protection mechanism of 2-hydroxyphenylbenzotriazoles is based upon energy dissipation via an excited state proton transfer from the phenolic OH group to the triazole nitrogen(s). Using 1H-NMR NOE experiments we have established that 2-(2’hydroxy-5′- methylphenyl)-benzotriazole (UVA1) exists in chloroform as an intramolecularly H-bonded form whereas in DMSO this bond is disrupted by the formation of intermolecular H-bonding to the solvent. Conversely, for compounds 2-(2′-hydroxy-3′,5′-di(1,1-dimethyl propane))-benzotriazole (UVA2), and 3′-methylene-hydantoin-2-(2′-hydroxy-5′-methylphenyl)-benzotriazole (UVA3) having bulky substituents ortho to the phenolic OH group 1H-NMR NOE experiments indicate that upon changing solvent from DMSO to chloroform the strength of the intramolecular H-bond is not appreciably affected. The implication of the H-bond strength upon the UV stabilizing effectiveness is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hobley et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: