Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Kant’s progressive philosophy of history is an integral aspect of his critical system, yet it is often ignored or even treated as an embarrassment by contemporary scholars. In this article, I defend Kant and argue for the continuing relevance of his regulative assumption of historical progress. I suggest, furthermore, that the first-person stance of practical belief exemplified in Kant’s conception of hope offers new resources for thinking about the relationship between the ideal and the real in political theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loren Goldman (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: