Key result
Intracardiac echocardiography provided higher imaging quality than intravascular ultrasound, revealing acute wall thickening after radiofrequency (P=0.003) and laser (P=0.003) but not cryoablation.
Why the study?
This pilot study aimed to compare ICE and IVUS for real-time LA wall imaging and assessment of acute tissue changes produced by radiofrequency, cryo, and laser catheter ablation.
Does intracardiac echocardiography provide better imaging quality than intravascular ultrasound for assessing left atrial wall thickness and acute tissue changes during pulmonary vein isolation?
Observational (n=12)
Does intracardiac echocardiography provide better imaging quality than intravascular ultrasound for assessing left atrial wall thickness and acute tissue changes during pulmonary vein isolation?
Intracardiac echocardiography provides superior imaging quality compared to intravascular ultrasound for assessing left atrial wall thickness and acute tissue changes during pulmonary vein isolation.
ICE may improve LA wall visualization over IVUS during PVI; leaves open modality-specific acute effects and requires randomized validation.
Introduction. Preliminary data in human suggest that both Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be used for real-time information on the left atrial (LA) wall thickness and on the acute tissue changes produced by energy delivery. This pilot study was conducted to compare ICE and IVUS for real-time LA wall imaging and assessment of acute tissue changes produced by radiofrequency (RF), cryo and laser catheter ablation. Methods Patients scheduled for RF, cryoballoon or laser balloon Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) catheter ablation were enrolled. Each pulmonary vein (PV) was imaged immediately before and after ablation with either ICE or IVUS. The performance of ICE and IVUS for imaging were compared. Pre- and post-ablation measurements (lumen and vessel diameters, areas and sphericity indexes, wall thickness and muscular sleeve thickness) were taken at the level of each PV ostium. Results A total of 48 PVs in 12 patients were imaged before and after ablation. Compared to IVUS, ICE showed higher imaging quality and inter-observer reproducibility of the PV measurements obtained. Acute wall thickening suggestive of oedema was observed after RF treatment (p = 0.003) and laser treatment (p = 0.003) but not after cryoablation (p = 0.69). Conclusions Our pilot study suggests that ICE is preferable to IVUS for LA wall thickness imaging at the LA-PV junctions during ablation. Ablation causes acute wall thickening when using RF or laser energy, but not cryoenergy delivery. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leo et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) (n=12). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was evaluated on Imaging quality, inter-observer reproducibility, and acute tissue changes (wall thickening). Intracardiac echocardiography provided higher imaging quality than intravascular ultrasound, revealing acute wall thickening after radiofrequency (P=0.003) and laser (P=0.003) but not cryoablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: