Why the study?
What is the impact of a broadly implemented strict interpretation of ASA Guidelines for Regional Anesthesia in Obstetrics on obstetric anesthesia care in small rural Alabama hospitals?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
Yes
What is the impact of a broadly implemented strict interpretation of ASA Guidelines for Regional Anesthesia in Obstetrics on obstetric anesthesia care in small rural Alabama hospitals?
Strict interpretation of ASA guidelines could limit statewide access to obstetric anesthesia care for approximately 6000 parturients annually in rural Alabama, suggesting guidelines should be interpreted with caution.
May restrict obstetric anesthesia access for ~6000 rural Alabama parturients if ASA guidelines are strictly applied; leaves open optimal guideline interpretation in resource-limited settings.
When the American Society of Anesthesiologists published its Guidelines for Regional Anesthesia in Obstetrics, I did a survey to determine what impact a broadly implemented strict interpretation of those guidelines might have on obstetric anesthesia care in small rural Alabama hospitals. Thirty-six rural Alabama hospitals with fewer than 200 beds were included in the survey, with a response rate of 50%. Data included total deliveries, cesarean section rates, utilization rates of anesthesia services, personnel providing anesthesia care, and identification of physician personnel available during labor and cesarean section. Results showed that anesthesia care is provided for approximately 52% of births in the responding hospitals. Of these, approximately 60% of cesarean sections and 90% of vaginal deliveries are not routinely attended by anesthesiologists. If these data also reflect the nonrespondent hospitals, statewide access could be limited for approximately 6000 parturients annually. The Guidelines should be interpreted with caution. Rather than conform to related policies, interpretation should allow implementation consistent with the capabilities of the individual institutions, while ensuring quality anesthesia care for the parturients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David A. Cross (1993) conducted a cross-sectional in Obstetric anesthesia care (n=18). Strict interpretation of ASA Guidelines for Regional Anesthesia in Obstetrics was evaluated on Proportion of births receiving anesthesia care and personnel attendance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: