Key result
Arab hospital survey reveals varied obstetric anesthesia practices with 98% using spinals for cesarean deliveries.
Why the study?
Obstetric anesthesia practices vary across settings and limited data exist from Arab countries regarding structural and process-related indicators.
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
Yes
This survey highlights variations in obstetric anesthesia practices among major hospitals in Arab countries compared to international recommendations.
Highlights practice variations across Arab hospitals; leaves open region-specific guideline development and further study.
BACKGROUND: Obstetric anesthesia guidelines are essential for standardizing obstetric anesthesia practices globally and ensuring high-quality patient care. However, practices may vary across different settings, and there are limited data from Arab countries. This study aims to gain insights into obstetric anesthesia practices in several major hospitals across Arab countries. METHODS: A questionnaire was emailed to 85 obstetric anesthesiologists/anesthesia chairpersons in major hospitals, including academic medical institutions and central hospitals, across 11/22 Arab countries. This survey gathered data on key structural and process-related obstetric anesthesia indicators. RESULTS: Out of 85 contacted, we had 56 responses (65.8%), with 41 being fully completed, providing insights into obstetric anesthesia indicators. Regarding structure: 31 (76%) hospitals had an operating room adjacent to the delivery room, all had intensive care units, and 22 (54%) had a lead obstetric anesthesiologist. For equipment, 19 (46%) had a video laryngoscope in the delivery suite, and 20 (49%) occasionally used ultrasound for epidurals. Regarding process: 33 (81%) held regular meetings, and 21 (51%) conducted research. Before epidural and spinal procedures, 26 (63%) and 28 (68%) required coagulation studies for patients without a history of hemorrhagic complications, while 38 (93%) and 36 (88%) mandated a platelet count, respectively. For labor analgesia, 34 (83%) primarily used epidurals, and 15 (37%) placed preemptive catheters in high-risk pregnancies. For cesarean delivery, 40 (98%) used spinals, with 16 (39%) using intrathecal morphine and 22 (54%) administering aspiration prophylaxis before general anesthesia. Regarding spinal-induced hypotension, 6 (15%) used prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights variations in obstetric anesthesia practices among various major hospitals in several Arab countries, compared to international recommendations. It emphasizes the need for obstetric anesthesia registries in the Arab world for future research. Further studies are required to outline country-specific practices, improve resource allocation, and enhance obstetric population safety and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nafeh et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Obstetric anesthesia practices (n=41). Obstetric anesthesia practices was evaluated on Obstetric anesthesia structure and process indicators. A survey of 41 major hospitals across 11 Arab countries revealed variations in obstetric anesthesia practices, with 83% primarily using epidurals for labor analgesia and 98% using spinals for cesarean deliveries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: