Why the study?
Disparity exists in anesthesia practices between high- and low-to-middle income countries, and establishing international collaborations and practice guidelines may improve obstetric anesthesia care and patient safety in Armenia.
Does a multiyear international collaboration improve the use of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric care in Armenia?
Observational
Yes
Does a multiyear international collaboration improve the use of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric care in Armenia?
p-value: p=< 0.0001
International collaboration and guideline development can significantly improve obstetric anesthesia practices and standardize care in low-to-middle income countries.
International collaborations may improve neuraxial anesthesia use in LMICs; leaves open scalability without local adaptation.
BACKGROUND: Disparity exists in anesthesia practices between high- and low-to-middle income countries, and awareness has been raised within the global health community to improve the standards of anesthesia care and patient safety. The establishment of international collaborations and appropriate practice guidelines may help address clinical care deficiencies. This report's aim was to assess the impact of a multiyear collaboration on obstetric anesthesia practices in the Republic of Armenia. METHODS: An invited multinational team of physicians conducted six visits to Armenia between 2006 and 2015 to observe current practice and establish standards of obstetric anesthesia care. The Armenian Society of Anaesthesiologists and Intensive Care specialists collected data on the numbers of vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and neuraxial anesthesia use in maternity units during the period. Data were analyzed with the Fisher exact or chi-square test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Neuraxial anesthesia use for cesarean delivery increased significantly (P < 0.0001) in all 10 maternity hospitals within the capital city of Yerevan. For epidural labor analgesia, there was sustained or increased use in only two hospitals. For hospitals located outside the capital city, there was a similar increase in the use of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery that was greater in hospitals that were visited by an external team (P < 0.0001); however, use of epidural labor analgesia was not increased significantly. Over the course of the collaboration, guidelines for obstetric anesthesia were drafted and approved by the Armenian Ministry of Health. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between Armenian anesthesiologists and dedicated visiting physicians to update and standardize obstetric anesthesia practices led to national practice guidelines and sustained improvements in clinical care in the Republic of Armenia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuill et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Obstetric anesthesia practices. Multiyear international collaboration and visiting physician team vs. Baseline practices and hospitals not visited by the external team was evaluated on Neuraxial anesthesia use for cesarean delivery (p=< 0.0001). A multiyear international collaboration significantly increased the use of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery across maternity hospitals in the Republic of Armenia (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: