Key result
International clinical education collaboration linked to ~105% higher odds of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Why the study?
Many middle and low income countries report low rates of regional anesthesia use for cesarean delivery and neuraxial analgesia for labor despite their benefits.
Does an international clinical education collaboration increase the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery and labor in a Serbian teaching hospital?
Observational (n=31,846)
No
Does an international clinical education collaboration increase the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery and labor in a Serbian teaching hospital?
Odds Ratio: 2.05 (95% CI 1.73–2.42)
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 14%
p-value: p=<0.001
An international educational collaboration significantly increased the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery and labor in a Serbian hospital, though the absolute rates remained relatively low.
International education partnerships may increase RA use for CD and NAL in similar settings; leaves open sustainability and generalizability beyond this single-center observational report.
Many middle and low income countries (LMIC) report low rates of regional anesthesia (RA) use for cesarean delivery (CD), despite its association with lower maternal major morbidity and mortality. Also, the prevalence of neuraxial analgesia for labor (NAL) is often low in LMICs. We report on the results of a collaboration in clinical education over a multi-year period between Kybele Inc., an international non-profit organization, and Klinicki Centar Vojvodine (CCV), a teaching hospital in Novi Sad, Serbia, to increase RA use for CD and NAL at CCV. From late 2011 through 2015, teams from Kybele participated in annual to biannual didactic conferences and week-long bedside teaching efforts involving obstetric and anesthesia staff from CCV and surrounding hospitals. Ongoing contact occurred at least weekly between Kybele and the host to discuss progress. De-identified quality improvement data on total deliveries, numbers of elective and non-elective CDs, number of vaginal deliveries, type of anesthesia for CD, and the number of NALs were collected. RA use for CD increased to 25% in year 2015 vs 14% in base year 2011 (odds ratio (OR): 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.73,2.42; p < 0.001). NAL increased to 10.5% of laboring women in 2015 versus 1.2% in 2011 (OR: 9.6; 95% CI: 7.2, 12.8; p < 0.001). Greater increases for RA use during non-elective CD were observed between 2011 and 2015 (1.4% vs. 7.5% of total CD; OR: 5.52; 95% CI: 2.63, 8.41; p < 0.001) relative to elective CD (12.5% vs. 17.5% of total CD; OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.77; p < 0.001). Overall, RA for CD increased during the four year collaboration, but was not as great as reported in other countries with similar health care demographics utilizing a similar program. Detailed descriptions of program interventions and barriers to change at CCV are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baysinger et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Pregnancy requiring cesarean or vaginal delivery (n=31,846). International clinical education collaboration (Kybele Inc.) vs. Baseline year 2011 (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Regional anesthesia use for cesarean delivery (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.73-2.42, p=<0.001). An international clinical education collaboration increased the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery from 14% in 2011 to 25% in 2015 (OR 2.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: