Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 30, 2013The Bone & Joint JournalOpen Access

Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ØGØystein GøthesenHaukeland University HospitalBEBirgitte EspehaugBergen Community CollegeLHLeif Ivar HavelinHaukeland University Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Gøthesen et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a97ac6478a91a1f562d237ahttps://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b5.30271
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Does patella resurfacing really matter? Pain and function in 972 patients after primary total knee arthroplasty2010 · 71 citations
  2. 2Early failures among 7,174 primary total knee replacements: A follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-20002002 · 185 citations
  3. 3Cemented Rotating-Platform Total Knee Replacement2005 · 208 citations
  4. 4Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing2011 · 52 citations
  5. 5Uncemented Rotating-Platform Total Knee Replacement2004 · 89 citations