Key result
Providers receiving academic detailing had higher documentation of anticoagulation mention compared to non-AD providers (64% vs 35%), but showed no improvement compared to their own baseline.
Why the study?
To compare providers receiving and not receiving academic detailing regarding the inclusion of educational topics and shared decision-making elements in documentation.
Does educational outreach with modified academic detailing improve provider documentation of shared decision-making and anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=148)
Does educational outreach with modified academic detailing improve provider documentation of shared decision-making and anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 64% vs 35%
Educational outreach with academic detailing did not improve provider documentation of shared decision-making for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation compared to baseline, highlighting the need for more focused interventions.
Academic detailing showed no within-provider improvement in AF documentation; leaves open whether targeted interventions can enhance shared decision-making.
BACKGROUND: A previously tested intervention featured educational outreach with modified academic detailing (AD) to increase anticoagulation use in patients with atrial fibrillation. Currently, this study compares providers receiving and not receiving AD in terms of inclusion of AD educational topics and shared decision-making elements in documentation. METHODS: Physicians reviewed themes discussed with providers during AD and evaluated charts for evidence of shared decision-making. Frequencies of documentation of individual items for providers receiving AD versus non-AD providers were compared. To understand baseline documentation practices of AD providers, encounters of AD providers before their AD participation were randomly selected. RESULTS: There were 113 eligible encounters in the four months after AD-36 from AD providers and 77 from non-AD providers. Thirty-five encounters were identified from AD providers before participating in the intervention. Providers infrequently documented many reviewed items (% documenting): anticoagulation mentioned (44%), multiple options for anticoagulation (5%), CHA2DS2-VASc score (11%), bleeding risk factors (2%). Compared with non-AD providers, AD providers had statistically significant higher percentages for the following items: mention of anticoagulation (64% versus 35%), stroke risk (11% versus 0%), anticoagulation benefits (8% versus 0%), and patient involvement (17% versus 0%). There was no improvement, however, for AD providers compared with baseline documentation percentages. DISCUSSION: Providers infrequently documented important items in anticoagulation management and shared decision-making. AD participation did not improve documentation. Improving adoption of AD educational items may require more prolonged interaction with providers. Improving shared decision-making may require an intervention more focused on it and its documentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoque et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=148). Educational outreach with modified academic detailing (AD) vs. Providers not receiving academic detailing was evaluated on Documentation of anticoagulation mention. Providers receiving academic detailing had higher documentation of anticoagulation mention compared to non-AD providers (64% vs 35%), but showed no improvement compared to their own baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: