Key result
AF is linked to ~78% higher all-cause mortality in patients with at least mild AS.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is common in patients with aortic stenosis, but its independent long-term prognostic impact on outcomes remains uncertain.
Does atrial fibrillation increase the risk of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF?
Cohort (n=1,592)
Does atrial fibrillation increase the risk of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.78 (95% CI 1.34–2.36)
p-value: p=<0.001
Atrial fibrillation is independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with aortic stenosis, highlighting the need to integrate AF into risk stratification algorithms.
AF marks higher mortality risk warranting attention; leaves open whether intervention improves survival.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), but its independent long‐term prognostic impact on outcomes remains uncertain. We examined the association between AF and mortality risk across the full spectrum of AS. Method In this retrospective cohort study, we included 1592 patients with at least mild AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%). Patients were stratified by AF status. Primary and secondary end points were all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Results Of 1592 patients, including the full spectrum of AS severity, 254 (16%) had AF. AF was more prevalent in patients with severe paradoxical low‐flow low‐gradient (36%) compared with severe normal‐flow (12%), severe high‐gradient (10%), and mild‐to‐moderate (16%) AS ( P <0.001). During a median follow‐up of 7.2 (interquartile range, 3.6–11.0) years, 885 deaths occurred (49% cardiovascular‐related). AF was associated with an increased risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality (both P <0.001). In multivariable Cox models, AF independently predicted a higher risk of all‐cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.34–2.36], P <0.001) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.20–2.62], P =0.004) mortality. The prognostic impact was greatest for permanent/persistent AF (HR, 2.04) and significant for paroxysmal AF (HR, 1.69). The association of AF with outcomes remained consistent across various subgroups, including AS flow‐gradient patterns (all interaction P >0.05). Conclusion In this large cohort with AS, AF was independently associated with an increased risk of both all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, regardless of treatment strategy or AS flow‐gradient pattern. AF should be integrated into risk stratification algorithms in AS, beyond parameters of AS severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reed-Métayer et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in aortic stenosis (n=1,592). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.34-2.36, p=<0.001). Atrial fibrillation was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.34-2.36; P<0.001) in patients with at least mild aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: