Key result
Low handgrip strength was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality in both men (HR 3.45) and women (HR 3.30) compared to those with the highest grip strength.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the association between handgrip strength and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in US adults.
Does low handgrip strength predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Cohort (n=10,470)
Does low handgrip strength predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Hazard Ratio: 3.45 (95% CI 2.14–5.58)
Absolute Event Rate: 27.2% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Low handgrip strength is a strong, independent predictor of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether HGS-based interventions improve survival.
Objective To investigate the association between handgrip strength (HGS) with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in US adults. Method We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) prospective cohort study (2011–2014) with 10,470 participants. The cox regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, fitted curves, ROC curves, and propensity score-matched analysis (PSM) with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), SMRW (PSM with repeated weights), PA (pairwise algorithm), and OW (overlap weighting) regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship between HGS and all-cause and CVD mortality. Results The low HGSs (men <37.4 kg, women <24 kg), was found to be associated with higher all-cause and CVD mortality in a reverse J-shaped curve ( p < 0.05). Adjusting for multiple covariates including age, BMI, race, education level, marriage status, smoking and alcohol use, and various comorbidities, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in the lowest HGS quintile 1 (Q1) was 3.45 (2.14–5.58) for men and 3.3 (1.88–5.79) for women. For CVD mortality, the HR was 2.99 (1.07–8.37) for men and 10.35 (2.29–46.78) for women. The area under the curve (AUC) for HGS alone as a predictor of all-cause mortality was 0.791 (0.768–0.814) for men and 0.780 (0.752–0.807) for women ( p < 0.05), while the AUC for HGS and age was 0.851 (0.830–0.871) for men and 0.848 (0.826–0.869) for women ( p < 0.05). For CVD mortality, the AUC for HGS alone was 0.785 (95% CI 0.738–0.833) for men and 0.821 (95% CI 0.777–0.865) for women ( p < 0.05), while the AUC for HGS and age as predictors of all-cause mortality was 0.853 (0.861–0.891) for men and 0.859 (0.821–0.896) for women ( p < 0.05). The HGS Q1 (men <37.4 kg and women <24 kg) was matched separately for PSM. After univariate, multivariate Cox regression models, PSM, IPTW, SMRW, PA, and OW analyses, women had 2.37–3.12 and 2.92–5.12 HRs with low HGS for all-cause and CVD mortality, while men had 2.21–2.82 and 2.33–2.85 for all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Adults with low HGS exhibited a significantly increased risk of both all-cause and CVD mortality, regardless of gender. Additionally, low HGS served as an independent risk factor and predictor for both all-cause and CVD mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in All-cause and cardiovascular mortality (n=10,470). Low handgrip strength vs. High handgrip strength was evaluated on All-cause mortality (lowest vs highest handgrip strength quintile in men) (HR 3.45, 95% CI 2.14-5.58, p=<0.001). Low handgrip strength was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality in both men (HR 3.45) and women (HR 3.30) compared to those with the highest grip strength.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: