Key result
In elderly patients with coronary perforation during PCI, covered stent implantation successfully sealed all ruptures and resulted in a 40% MACE rate and 20% mortality over a mean 31.7-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Does covered stent implantation provide favorable long-term efficacy and safety in elderly patients with coronary perforation during PCI?
Observational (n=10)
No
Does covered stent implantation provide favorable long-term efficacy and safety in elderly patients with coronary perforation during PCI?
Covered stent implantation effectively seals coronary perforations in elderly patients during PCI, with acceptable long-term outcomes when followed by two years of dual antiplatelet therapy.
May support covered stent sealing in elderly PCI perforations; leaves open long-term MACE risk versus alternatives in larger studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of covered stent implantation in the treatment of elderly patients with coronary perforation while undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: From June 2004 to June 2012, our center has followed ten elderly patients (age ≥ 60 years) who sustained coronary perforation during PCI. The major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were observed as well. The patients were advised to take 75 mg/day Clopidogrel for two years, and indefinite use of 100 mg/day enteric-coated aspirin. RESULTS: Six out of the 10 patients aged from 60 to 76 years old (mean 68.6 ± 5.2 years) were male, four were female. The average diameter of the implanted stents was 3.3 ± 0.3 mm, and the average length was 22.1 ± 3.7 mm. All the ruptures were successfully sealed without intra-procedural death. The follow-up duration ranged from 0.6 to 67 months (mean 31.7 ± 24.5 months). One patient died of multiple organ failure due to lung infection in 19 days after PCI; one died of cardiac sudden death in 13 months after PCI; one had angina pectoris in 53 months after PCI; one underwent multi-slice CT examination in six months after PCI, and no in-stent restenosis was found. The other four patients received angiography follow-up, and the results showed that three patients had no intra-stent restenosis, while one had left anterior descending (LAD) restenosis in the covered stent in 67 months after PCI. The in-hospital mortality was 10% (1/10). The MACE rate in 12 months after PCI was 10% (1/10). During the entire followed-up period, the restenosis rate in target vessels was 20% (1/5), mortality was 20% (2/10), and the MACE rate was 40% (4/10). CONCLUSION: Treatment of coronary perforation by using covered stents can achieve favorable long-term results; a two-year dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI can effectively prevent intra-stent thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention (n=10). Covered stent implantation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during entire follow-up. In elderly patients with coronary perforation during PCI, covered stent implantation successfully sealed all ruptures and resulted in a 40% MACE rate and 20% mortality over a mean 31.7-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: