Key result
The deep learning autoencoder approach recognized 59.7% of ECG-detected premature ventricular contractions using only wearable PPG signals, with a false positive rate of 23.2%.
Why the study?
Can an LSTM deep neural network accurately recognize cardiac abnormalities using only wearable device photoplethysmography (PPG) signals compared to bedside ECG?
Observational (n=29)
Yes
Can an LSTM deep neural network accurately recognize cardiac abnormalities using only wearable device photoplethysmography (PPG) signals compared to bedside ECG?
A deep learning model using PPG signals from wearable devices can detect over 60% of PVCs without the need for an ECG, offering a potential tool for continuous long-term rhythm monitoring.
PPG wearables may enable long-term rhythm monitoring; leaves open accuracy versus ECG for clinical decisions.
Cardiac abnormalities affecting heart rate and rhythm are commonly observed in both healthy and acutely unwell people. Although many of these are benign, they can sometimes indicate a serious health risk. ECG monitors are typically used to detect these events in electrical heart activity, however they are impractical for continuous long-term use. In contrast, current-generation wearables with optical photoplethysmography (PPG) have gained popularity with their low-cost, lack of wires and tiny size. Many cardiac abnormalities such as ectopic beats and AF can manifest as both obvious and subtle anomalies in a PPG waveform as they disrupt blood flow. We propose an automatic method for recognising these anomalies in PPG signal alone, without the need for ECG. We train an LSTM deep neural network on 400,000 clean PPG samples to learn typical PPG morphology and rhythm, and flag PPG signal diverging from this as cardiac abnormalities. We compare the cardiac abnormalities our approach recognises with the ectopic beats recorded by a bedside ECG monitor for 29 patients over 47.6 hours of gold standard observations. Our proposed cardiac abnormality recognition approach recognises 60%+ of ECG-detected PVCs in PPG signal, with a false positive rate of 23% - demonstrating the compelling power and value of this novel approach. Finally we examine how cardiac abnormalities manifest in PPG signal for in- and out-of-hospital patient populations using a wearable device during standard care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whiting et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiac abnormalities (Premature Ventricular Contractions) (n=29). Deep learning autoencoder anomaly detection on wearable PPG signal vs. Bedside ECG monitor (Gold Standard) was evaluated on Recognition of ECG-detected PVCs (>= 1 PVC/min). The deep learning autoencoder approach recognized 59.7% of ECG-detected premature ventricular contractions using only wearable PPG signals, with a false positive rate of 23.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: