Key result
Intensive blood pressure control (target <120 mm Hg) significantly attenuated the increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity compared with standard treatment (9.0 vs 10.0 m/s; P<0.001).
Why the study?
The authors sought to examine the effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on indexes of aortic stiffness in SPRINT participants.
Does intensive blood pressure treatment reduce aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients?
RCT (n=337)
Does intensive blood pressure treatment reduce aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 10%
p-value: p=<0.001
Intensive blood pressure lowering to <120 mm Hg attenuates increases in aortic stiffness, providing a potential mechanism for the cardiovascular benefits observed in the SPRINT trial.
Intensive BP lowering may attenuate aortic stiffening progression; leaves open whether stiffness mediates outcomes or should guide therapy.
In a subgroup of 337 participants (mean age 64±9 years; 45% women) from the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), where participants were randomly assigned to intensive treatment (target systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg) versus standard treatment (<140 mm Hg), we examined the effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on indexes of aortic stiffness. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, a validated global measure of aortic stiffness, was measured by echo-guided Doppler at baseline and 18-month follow-up visit. Aortic elastance, distensibility, and compliance were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. During follow-up, the intensive treatment produced a mean between-group reduction in systolic blood pressure of 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.1–14.3 mm Hg). During follow-up, intensive treatment significantly attenuated the increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity compared with standard treatment (adjusted follow-up least square mean=9.0 m/s [95% CI, 8.7–9.3] versus 10.0 m/s [9.6–10.3]; P <0.001), an effect that persisted even after adjusting for mean arterial pressure. Intensive treatment also decreased the aortic elastance index (least square mean, 1.38 mm Hg/mL per m 2 [95% CI, 1.34–1.41] versus 1.48 mm Hg/mL per m 2 [95% CI, 1.44–1.51], P =0.002) compared with standard treatment. No significant between-group differences were observed for aortic distensibility and compliance. We conclude that intensive treatment significantly attenuated increases in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and aortic elastance index. Attenuation of increases in aortic stiffness may be one of the mechanisms contributing to the benefit of intensive blood pressure treatment observed in SPRINT. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Upadhya et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=337). Intensive blood pressure control vs. Standard treatment (target systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg) was evaluated on Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p=<0.001). Intensive blood pressure control (target <120 mm Hg) significantly attenuated the increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity compared with standard treatment (9.0 vs 10.0 m/s; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: