Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes, exposure to DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of hospital admission for heart failure (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.07).
Why the study?
Does DPP-4 inhibitor use increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to other antidiabetic treatments?
Case-Control (n=282,000)
Does DPP-4 inhibitor use increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to other antidiabetic treatments?
Odds Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.94–1.07)
In a large real-world population of patients with type 2 diabetes, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of heart failure hospitalization, contrasting with the safety signal observed in the SAVOR TIMI-53 trial.
No HF hospitalization signal with DPP-4i in unselected diabetes patients; leaves open whether SAVOR findings reflect specific trial populations.
OBJECTIVE: The SAVOR TIMI-53 study reported a significant increase in the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) in patients treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in comparison with placebo. A recent case-control study in part confirmed this risk signal. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of HF in relation to DPP-4i use versus any antidiabetic treatment. DESIGN: Population-based matched case-control study conducted using administrative data. SETTING: The Italian Region of Piedmont (4.4 million inhabitants). PARTICIPANTS: From a database of 282,000 patients treated with antidiabetic drugs, we identified 14,613 hospitalisations for HF, 7212 incident cases, and 1727 hospital re-admissions between 2008 and 2012; each case was matched for gender, age and antidiabetic therapy with 10 controls; cases and controls were compared for exposure to DPP-4i. OUTCOME MEASURES: ORs and 95% CIs were calculated by fitting a conditional logistic model. All analyses were adjusted for available risk factors for HF. RESULTS: We found no increased risk of hospitalisation for HF associated with the use of DPP-4i (OR for admission for HF 1.00 (0.94 to 1.07), incident HF1.01 (0.92 to 1.11), recurrent HF 1.02 (0.84 to 1.22)). All-cause mortality was 6% lower in DPP-4i users (p<0.001), whereas insulin users showed an excess of risk for any type of hospital admission (19%) and death (20%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, in an unselected population of diabetic patients, the use of DPP-4i is not associated with an increased risk of HF. The favourable impact on all-cause mortality should be viewed with caution and also other explanations investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giorda et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Type 2 diabetes (n=282,000). Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors vs. Any other antidiabetic treatment was evaluated on Hospitalisation for heart failure (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07). In patients with type 2 diabetes, exposure to DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of hospital admission for heart failure (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: