Key result
Fenestrated and branched devices for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair appear to be safe and effective options for anatomically challenging aneurysms.
Fenestrated and branched endovascular devices expand the patient population suited for endovascular repair of anatomically challenging abdominal aortic aneurysms.
New devices expand EVAR options for complex anatomy; leaves open durability and comparative effectiveness questions.
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) provides an attractive alternative to traditional open techniques. Endovascular repair is frequently limited by aortic aneurysm neck angulation, the absence of an adequate infrarenal neck, and the need for internal iliac preservation. Several devices have been created to incorporate visceral artery segments as well as preserve the internal iliac artery, thus broadening the patient population suited for endovascular repair. This article will provide a review of the current literature regarding fenestrated devices, branch devices, off-the-shelf devices, and physician-modified devices. It will also highlight the iliac branch stent grafts currently on trial for internal iliac artery preservation. Data thus far have suggested that these devices will be both a safe and effective option for anatomically challenging abdominal aortic aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graves et al. (2015) conducted a review in Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Fenestrated and branched devices was evaluated. Fenestrated and branched devices for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair appear to be safe and effective options for anatomically challenging aneurysms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: