Key result
Excess pressure derived from intra-arterial blood pressure closely approximated blood flow velocity waveform morphology at both brachial (median r=0.96) and radial (median r=0.95) arteries.
Why the study?
Excess pressure calculated from the blood pressure waveform is purported to be an analogue of blood flow velocity, but this had never been examined in detail.
Does excess pressure derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms accurately approximate blood flow velocity measured by Doppler ultrasound?
Observational (n=98)
Does excess pressure derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms accurately approximate blood flow velocity measured by Doppler ultrasound?
Effect estimate: median r = 0.96 (brachial) and r = 0.95 (radial)
Excess pressure derived from blood pressure waveforms closely approximates blood flow velocity, offering a novel method to assess arterial blood flow without ultrasound.
May support excess pressure as noninvasive flow-velocity surrogate; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
INTRODUCTION: Derivation of blood flow velocity from a blood pressure waveform is a novel technique, which could have potential clinical importance. Excess pressure, calculated from the blood pressure waveform via the reservoir-excess pressure model, is purported to be an analogue of blood flow velocity but this has never been examined in detail, which was the aim of this study. METHODS: Intra-arterial blood pressure was measured sequentially at the brachial and radial arteries via fluid-filled catheter simultaneously with blood flow velocity waveforms recorded via Doppler ultrasound on the contralateral arm (n = 98, aged 61 ± 10 years, 72% men). Excess pressure was derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms using pressure-only reservoir-excess pressure analysis. RESULTS: Brachial and radial blood flow velocity waveform morphology were closely approximated by excess pressure derived from their respective sites of measurement (median cross-correlation coefficient r = 0.96 and r = 0.95 for brachial and radial comparisons, respectively). In frequency analyses, coherence between blood flow velocity and excess pressure was similar for brachial and radial artery comparisons (brachial and radial median coherence = 0.93 and 0.92, respectively). Brachial and radial blood flow velocity pulse heights were correlated with their respective excess pressure pulse heights (r = 0.53, P < 0.001 and r = 0.43, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Excess pressure is an analogue of blood flow velocity, thus affording the opportunity to derive potentially important information related to arterial blood flow using only the blood pressure waveform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong et al. (2020) reported an observational. Excess pressure derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms vs. Blood flow velocity recorded via Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Cross-correlation between excess pressure and blood flow velocity waveform morphology (median r = 0.96 (brachial) and r = 0.95 (radial)). Excess pressure derived from intra-arterial blood pressure closely approximated blood flow velocity waveform morphology at both brachial (median r=0.96) and radial (median r=0.95) arteries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: