Key result
The diastolic rate constant derived from the brachial artery was significantly associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (β = -0.20, P = 0.03), similar to aortic measurements.
Why the study?
Peripheral artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters related to diastolic waveform morphology may represent central parameters and share associations with end-organ damage, but this has never been determined.
Are peripheral artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters associated with kidney function similarly to central parameters?
Observational (n=220)
Are peripheral artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters associated with kidney function similarly to central parameters?
Effect estimate: β = -0.20
p-value: p=0.03
The diastolic rate constant derived from the brachial artery is consistent with aortic measurements and is significantly associated with kidney dysfunction, suggesting its potential utility in clinical blood pressure risk stratification.
May enable brachial measurements as aortic surrogates for kidney function assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Central artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters are clinically important but impractical to record directly. However, diastolic waveform morphology is consistent across central and peripheral arteries. Therefore, peripheral artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters related to diastolic waveform morphology may be representative of central parameters and share clinically important associations with end-organ damage. This has never been determined and was the aim of this study. METHODS: Intra-arterial blood pressure (BP) waveforms were measured sequentially at the aorta, brachial, and radial arteries among 220 individuals (aged 61 ± 10 years, 68% male). Customized software was used to derive reservoir-excess pressure parameters at each arterial site (reservoir and excess pressure, systolic and diastolic rate constants) and clinical relevance was determined by association with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: Between the aorta and brachial artery, the mean difference in the diastolic rate constant and reservoir pressure integral was -0.162 S-1 (P = 0.08) and -0.772 mm Hg s (P = 0.23), respectively. The diastolic rate constant had the strongest and most consistent associations with eGFR across aortic and brachial sites (β = -0.20, P = 0.02; β = -0.20, P = 0.03, respectively; adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors). Aortic, but not brachial peak reservoir pressure was associated with eGFR in adjusted models (aortic β = -0.48, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The diastolic rate constant is the most consistent reservoir-excess pressure parameter, in both its absolute values and associations with kidney dysfunction, when derived from the aorta and brachial artery. Thus, the diastolic rate constant could be utilized in the clinical setting to improve BP risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong et al. (2020) reported an observational. Peripheral (brachial) artery reservoir-excess pressure parameters vs. Central (aortic) artery parameters was evaluated on Association with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β = -0.20, p=0.03). The diastolic rate constant derived from the brachial artery was significantly associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (β = -0.20, P = 0.03), similar to aortic measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: