Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three donor–acceptor type copolymers, poly[9,9′-dioctylfluorene-alt-2,5-bis(seleno-2-yl)-2,3-bis(4-hexyloxyphenyl)quinoxaline] (PFSeQ), poly[9-(1′-octylnonylidene)fluorene-alt-2,5-bis(seleno-2-yl)-2,3-bis(4-hexyloxyphenyl)quinoxaline] (PAFSeQ), and poly[N-9′-heptadecanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt-2,5-bis(seleno-2-yl)-2,3-bis(4-hexyloxyphenyl)quinoxaline] (PCSeQ), were synthesized through Suzuki coupling reactions for use as organic photovoltaic materials with high VOC values. In these polymers, selenophene, which has stronger electron-donating property than thiophene, was adopted as a spacer. The polymers had relatively low optical band gaps (<1.9 eV). We investigated bulk heterojunction type polymer solar cells based on the synthesized polymers used as electron donor materials and [6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) or [6,6]-phenyl C71 butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) used as the acceptor. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the devices was in the range of 1.1–3.3% under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW cm−2). Among these polymers, PFSeQ exhibited the best device performance with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 3.3% upon the introduction of PC71BM as the acceptor. This is the highest performance among photovoltaic materials containing selenophene units.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: