Key result
A preoperative caudal block with 1.5% lidocaine significantly reduced the MACBIS50 of sevoflurane compared to normal saline (1.40 vol% vs 1.77 vol%) in children.
Why the study?
Does a preoperative caudal block with lidocaine reduce the demand for sevoflurane for adequate depth of anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal herniorraphy?
RCT (n=20)
Does a preoperative caudal block with lidocaine reduce the demand for sevoflurane for adequate depth of anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal herniorraphy?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 1.77%
A preoperative caudal block with lidocaine significantly reduces the sevoflurane requirement for adequate depth of anesthesia in children.
May permit lower sevoflurane concentrations in children; leaves open confirmation before changing practice.
Background: It is generally known that neuraxial anesthesia for adults reduces the demand for hypnotics needed for adequate sedation. Therefore, this study examined the effect of a preoperative caudal block on the general anesthetic requirements for an adequate depth of anesthesia in children. Methods: Twenty children aged 3-5 years, who were set to undergo inguinal herniorraphy, were divided into 2 groups of 10 children each, normal saline and lidocaine groups. Tracheal intubation was performed. After setting up the bispectral index (BIS) monitor, a caudal block was administered to both groups differently, normal saline 0.7 ml/kg was administered to the normal saline group and 1.5% lidocaine 0.7 ml/kg was administered to lidocaine group. The end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was maintained at 1.5 vol% for 10 minutes in the first patient in both groups, and the BIS value, was measured 6 times every 10 seconds, and averaged. When the BIS was ≥ 50, the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was increased by 0.2 vol% in the subsequent patient. When the BIS was less than or equal to 50, the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was decreased by 0.2 vol% in the subsequent patient. The MACBIS50 in both groups was calculated using probit analysis. Relative median potency analysis was used to compare the results in both groups. Results: The MACBIS50 of sevoflurane was significantly lower with a 1.5% lidocaine caudal block (1.40 vol% [95% CI, 1.25-1.55 vol%]) compared with the normal saline group (1.77 vol% [95% CI, 1.61-2.00 vol%]). Conclusions: A preoperative caudal block reduces the demand for sevoflurane required for an adequate depth of anesthesia, as measured by the BIS in children. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2007; 52: 29~33)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Inguinal herniorraphy (n=20). Caudal block with 1.5% lidocaine vs. Normal saline caudal block was evaluated on MACBIS50 of sevoflurane. A preoperative caudal block with 1.5% lidocaine significantly reduced the MACBIS50 of sevoflurane compared to normal saline (1.40 vol% vs 1.77 vol%) in children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: