Key result
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is proposed as a promising non-invasive treatment option for autism spectrum disorders, though direct clinical efficacy studies are still needed.
Why the study?
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve core symptoms and comorbidities in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder?
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improve core symptoms and comorbidities in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder?
This review proposes transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as a potential therapeutic approach for the core symptoms and comorbidities of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
tVNS may modulate mood-related brain networks; leaves open clinical efficacy pending rigorous trials.
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) on the auricular branch of the vagus nerve has been receiving attention due to its therapeutic potential for neuropsychiatric disorders. Although the mechanism of tVNS is not yet completely understood, studies have demonstrated the potential role of vagal afferent nerve stimulation in the regulation of mood and visceral state associated with social communication. In addition, a growing body of evidence shows that tVNS can activate the brain regions associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), trigger neuroimmune modulation and produce treatment effects for comorbid disorders of ASD such as epilepsy and depression. We thus hypothesize that tVNS may be a promising treatment for ASD, not only for comorbid epilepsy and depression, but also for the core symptoms of ASD. The goal of this manuscript is to summarize the findings and rationales for applying tVNS to treat ASD and propose potential parameters for tVNS treatment of ASD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2017) conducted a review in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) was evaluated. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is proposed as a promising non-invasive treatment option for autism spectrum disorders, though direct clinical efficacy studies are still needed.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: